Why does David Wiley think that open education is commercial education? It is not enough to say that the licenses are incompatible - this is only a problem for commercial exploiters of free content.
(p.s. hate the comment window editor there's way too much flickering and toher stuff going on, and it breaks my spell-check and right-click - disabling copy and paste.)
David Wiley's presentation of the material on this issue is (uncharacteristically) very one-sided. I have criticized his view a number of times.
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/08/why-not-cc-by.html
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/noncommercial.html
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2006/06/cc-nc-2.html
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2006/06/cc-nc.html
Why does David Wiley think that open education is commercial education? It is not enough to say that the licenses are incompatible - this is only a problem for commercial exploiters of free content.
(p.s. hate the comment window editor there's way too much flickering and toher stuff going on, and it breaks my spell-check and right-click - disabling copy and paste.)