Performance improvement is generally the intended outcome of learning, right? So, why do we tend to address them separately? People are far more likely to ask me if I am learning a lot in school versus whether my performance as an instructional designer is improving – which should be the desired outcome, right? However, I haven’t jumped on the “performance improvement” wagon myself and I’m trying to figure out why. Everything I have read so far regarding performance improvement makes sense, but I can’t shake the perception that it applies in a transfer of knowledge / work setting context. Anyone care to share your opinion?
technorati tags:performance improvement, learning